Club News

 

User login

New Comments

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 days 18 hours ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 days 19 hours ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 days 22 hours ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 days 22 hours ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

3 days 17 hours ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

4 days 8 min ago

-508 DAF

4 days 42 min ago

--14c and 401Coventry Climax Fork Lift Truck (1949-64)

4 days 52 min ago

FRENCH DINKY TALBOT LAGO

4 days 1 hour ago

-Boxes General Discussions including end flaps, both British and French

4 days 1 hour ago

--14c and 401Coventry Climax Fork Lift Truck (1949-64)

2 weeks 4 days ago

--14c and 401Coventry Climax Fork Lift Truck (1949-64)

2 weeks 5 days ago

-508 DAF

1 month 1 week ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 1 week ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 1 week ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 1 week ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 2 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 2 weeks ago

-508 DAF

1 month 2 weeks ago

-508 DAF

1 month 2 weeks ago

-508 DAF

1 month 2 weeks ago

New arrivals

1 month 2 weeks ago

New arrivals

1 month 3 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 3 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 3 weeks ago

ORIGINAL MECCANO DINKY TOYS FACTORY BOX ART 175 HILLMAN MINX SALOON + DRAWING

1 month 3 weeks ago

--29c and 290 Double Decker Bus (1938-63)

1 month 3 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 3 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 3 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 3 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 3 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 3 weeks ago

--29c and 290 Double Decker Bus (1938-63)

1 month 3 weeks ago

--29c and 290 Double Decker Bus (1938-63)

1 month 3 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 3 weeks ago

Visitors

  • Total Visitors: 1639063
  • Registered Users: 388
  • Published Nodes: 1681
  • Since: 03/21/2024 - 12:56
31 posts / 0 new
Last post

janwerner's picture
janwerner
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

--24y and 540 Studebaker 'Commander' (1955-1960)

The Liverpool factory produced the Studebaker Land Cruiser in 1954, the French followed in 1955 with the new Commander, a famous design by Virgil Exner from the studio of Raymond Loewy. Scales of both are approximately 1/48 (the Commander possibly slightly larger, 1/46, at an actual length of 504 cm and a model length of 10.9 cm). Before that, in 1949, the French branch had already re-issued the originally pre-war British no. 39f Studebaker State Commander, nr. 24o, and, in the same year, it started the 25 series Studebaker trucks.

The model is in fact a hybrid, since the first Studebaker of this type, introduced in 1953, had a different grille (a pair of ‘flat triangles’). Compared with the surviving mock-up it appears to have been adjusted to the 1954 full-width version.

Initially, a crescent cut-out in the rear of the base plate for hooking up a caravan was wanting, but the second variant is provided with such a recess. The inside of the roof has always been chequered. The first variant was available in the basic colours of light green/dark green roof and orange/cream roof only. The second one also came in a new colour scheme, the flanks in the same color as the roof. This only applies to the orange with cream version, not the green one, and there was a cream version with dark red, in the two colour schemes. The third variant was issued as both no. 24y and 540. Roulet (2nd ed.) shows all kinds of colours and schemes, some of which are unique prototypes. The fourth version was issued as number 540 only and has concave wheel hubs.

The second colour scheme has never been shown in the catalogues. The 1959 catalogue shows a dual numbered model, exceptionally in blue with a white or cream roof. Such a copy has never showed up as far as known.

The box was initially without illustrations. Shortly thereafter it showed the two basic models, finished in green and orange. Initially it was numbered 24y, subsequently dual numbered 24y / 540. The boxed models were delivered in a trade pack of six.

This kind of Studebaker was available in real life as Commander, President or Champion. The V8 engine had a maximum power of 164 hp and attained a top speed of 170 km/h. For 100 km it consumed 19 liters of fuel, so about 1:5. Additions and corrections welcome! Kind regards, Jan 

dinkycollect's picture
dinkycollect
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

Jan W

The light blue model with cream roof as shown in the 1959 catalogue does exist as a single colour sample.

Jan Oldenhuis's picture
Jan Oldenhuis
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

For addition to the color variations, I add this photo of the 24y in red with cream roof, 24y in base, no towing eye and also with grid pattern inside roof. Together with UK Studebaker in light green, mid-green hubs with number 172 in base, with towing eye and Land Cruiser embossed inside roof.

Jan O.

janwerner's picture
janwerner
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

Thanks for these additions! By the way, did you notice (on both photos with the French and British Studebakers together) that the French were much earlier (c. 1955) with the adoption of the more realistic recessed lines for the contours of the doors, boots etc., whereas the Liverpool Dinky Toys still had the lines in relief until the early 1960s? Kind regards, Jan W

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Jan---Thanks for your always nice writeup and history of both the real car, and also the very nice Dinky model.  I think that the French Meccano factory did a pretty nice job of replicating the model, as it is close to being accurate to the real car.  I do believe that the roofline is slightly too low compare to the real car, but still very handsome.  You mentioned that the Dinky model is kind of a hybrid, and I agree.  After looking at some images online, it appears that the basic body style and detail is from the 1953-1954 Commander, but then married with a 1955 front end grill, which I happen to like better than those small triangle pieces.  The French Dinky factory also did something similar with the Buick Roadmaster model...which seems to combine styling and detail elements from both 1952 and 1953.  I have attached a photo of a 1955 Commander, so you can clearly see this later style grill.

     Best regards, Terry

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Jan---I also enjoyed your comments about the door lines...whether they be raised, as was the practice early on and for a long time, or recessed, which gives a more realistic look.  I have discussed this before, can't remember with who, but it is a mystery to me, as there does not seem to be a real defiinte time period for this happening or changing.  Even the French, who used it earlier, only seemed to use is sporadically.  The early 1950's Buick Roadmaster uses the recessed lines, to very good effect, as does the Studebaker Commander.  But the Ford Vedette, 24X, the later Vedette model, still has raised lines, as do the other French models from that era...such as the Simca Aronde, the Citroen 11BL. the Citroen 2CV.  But, by  the later 1950's, the French have switched over to the recessed lines....the Peugeot 403's, the Maserati, the Chrysler New Yorker, etc.

   But, on the other hand, the English factory made the Austin Atlantic convertible with recessed lines....the only English car of that early era to do so.  Even all those new cars, introduced around 1957-1958, all have raised line, although it appears they finally adopted thinner, less prominent lines on those later versions.  I don't ever remember hearing any discussion about this on any of the postings....perhaps Jacques has some comment.  Someone commented to me, that it would have been more difficult and time consuming to make the dies with recessed lines....which might be true.

  As a side note, even the recessed lines can be done less correctly.  My Simca Versailles has recessed lines, and I feel that on this model, they recessed them too deeply, which if the lighting is just right, makes them look pretty harsh and not nice.

   And, another comment on Studebaker:  I think the design and style of the Studebaker Commander, from 1953 on, reflects just how far ahead Raymond Loewy's Design Studio was compared to the rest of the US auto industry.  When you look at that Studebaker and then compare it to a 1953-1954 Chevrolet or Ford, it is amazing how advanced that look was, and how stodgy those other cars looks.  Today, these older Studebaker's command a lot of respect from knowledgable car guys, who appreciate their style.  Unfortunately, Studebaker suffered somewhat on quality control and reliability, so that, plus being so much smaller than GM, Ford, or Chrysler, doomed them to ultimately fail.  Interestingly, Studebaker had long been a maker of horse drawn wagons, in the late 1800's and into the early years of the twentieth century, and they survivied as a car maker much longer than most.  Here are a few photos of my Studebaker Commander....also an earlier version without the towing eye....

                     Best regards,  Terry

 

 

Townie54's picture
Townie54
Offline
DTCA Member

My 24y first type is missing silver grill detail.

janwerner's picture
janwerner
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

Hi Terry, the Austin Atlantic was a remarkable British exception indeed.

Even the later 'Vedette', with raised lines, was pre-1955.

I agree, these recessed lines were not always a success in the early years. They were often partly filled with spilled paint here and there. Kind regards, Jan 

dinkycollect's picture
dinkycollect
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

Yes indeed, the subject  of raised v. recessed lines has been discussed already somewhere.

The change from raised to recessed is due to the invention of spark erosion. Making a die with recedded lines is quite difficult with a milling machine. For raised lines, the die was fist made without any lines, the grove to make the raised lines was added later. With the spark erosion technique it did not matter wether the lines were raised or recessed.

I hope that you understand this, otherwise let me know.

The fact that the change did not happen from a certain model is probably due to the fact that Meccano did not make their own dies and that some of their tool makers sub contractors did or did not have a spark erosion machine.

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Jacques—-Thanks for your explanation! Many of us are not very well versed in the design and use of the dies, and I can only imagine that today they have entirely different techniques. That would tend to explain why some models got the recessed lines and others did not. The Austin Atlantic was first introduced quite early, so interesting that it happened to get that so early.
Thanks again!
Best regards, Terry

fodenway's picture
fodenway
Offline
DTCA MemberUK

If I am not mistaken, there is a casting variation on the Studebaker Commander involving the "Airplane" hood emblem, two distinctly different sizes being found. I noticed this at last year's AGM at Derby.

Kevin.

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Kevin——I have not heard that before, but will have to look at some of my reference material and see if it is mentioned. Possibly Jacques can add something....
Best regards, Terry

dinkycollect's picture
dinkycollect
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

The different in size of the emblem is probably due to a dirty painting mask which makes a smaller emblem. I am not aware of any casting variation on this model.

Jacques.

fodenway's picture
fodenway
Offline
DTCA MemberUK

Thank you for your comments gentlemen, i may be mistakenly thinking that the differences were in the Atlas reproductions that I saw at Derby, but worth checking both varieties anyway,

Kevin.

Jan Oldenhuis's picture
Jan Oldenhuis
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

I followed with great interest the discussion about the recessed lines. I had never looked at my models in this way and am really happy with this information. After research of my collection, I noticed that the later models DT 147 Cadillac 62 and 148 Ford Fairlane from 1962 were made with recessed lines again (see photos), in contrast to the British 50's models with raised lines (except the 140a Austin Atlantic). The 263 and 277 Superior Criterion Ambulances and the 146 Daimler V8 2,5 Litre also got the recessed lines. Remarkable that this was made again from 1962. If this has been discussed before, I would be very happy with a link to this discussion.

Jan Oldenhuis, 20 April 2018.

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Jan—-I agree....if this has been discussed before, I somehow missed it. It is little details such as this that make our wonderful hobby so interesting!
Best regards, Terry

dinkycollect's picture
dinkycollect
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

Jan O.

This discussion could be anywhere but try a search with "spark erosion" on TMT..

Jan Oldenhuis's picture
Jan Oldenhuis
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

Thanks Jacques. Unfortunately, the search function does not work at TMT. I will have to do it with Google.

Jan O.

Richard's picture
Richard
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

Dear friends.

Here under are two photos :

My variations colours and both base plate with and without the open rear for towing.

Kinds regards.

Richard

Townie54's picture
Townie54
Offline
DTCA Member

Looking at my ‘Commander’ I note the nicely cast squiggle in a circle behind the doors. Compounding the ‘54 body/‘55 grill hybrid nature of the model, is that the squiggle denotes the 6 cylinder engine of the base Champion rather the upmarket V8 Commander!

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

I looked very closely at my Studebaker Commander (with a magnifying glass), and that small circle area, with a "squiggle", to me seems to show a stylized S. But in looking at images of the real car, that clearly shows a V8 type symbol......and the Commander did come with a V-8 engine.

    Best regards,  Terry

Townie54's picture
Townie54
Offline
DTCA Member

No Terry you are wrong, the V8 had a V symbol in the circle, the s Type squiggle on the Dinky is the 6 cylinder. I’ll post a pic when I can!!

dinkycollect's picture
dinkycollect
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

                                  

The logo is definitely an S

                                  

this logo is not on the blue / cream pre production model and does not seem to be on the actual 1955 pilar less Commander coupe. See my post #2 above.

We know that the drawings and wooden mock-up of the Dinky Toys were made of the 1954 model and that the front was changed to the 1955 model. Had the mould been made already for the 1954 model ? Has the front been changed to the 1955 model before any pre production models were made ? Have some 1954 pre production castings been made ? Any how the Dinky is a hybrid 1954 model with a 1955 front, the 1954 model had a V8 logo which was not on the 1955 models, also the 1955 had a chrome moulding all along the body which the previous model did not have. The later finish of the Dinky with two colours roof and sides seem to be a Champion and not a Commander finish. The period Studebaker leaflet may confirm this.

                                                                                         a 1955 pilar less Commander

                                                                                        a 1955 Champion with pilar

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Jacques---I think you are right on what was made and where it came from.....we just do not know when or why things were done that way.  In a similar, but less severe manner, the 24v Buick Roadmaster was also a bit of a hybrid. About 95% of it is based on the 1952 Roadmaster, but the trim on the lower area of the sides is definitely from the 1953 Roadmaster.  Since it was not introduced until 1954, one has to wonder why they just didn't use the 1953 model.....

      Best regards,  Terry

Townie54's picture
Townie54
Offline
DTCA Member

Here are pictures of the Champion and Commander. S is referred to as the Champion 6 hardtop. Commander has the V8 logo. To confound matters I would say the Buick has 1950 side trim as found on the Roadmaster Riviera hardtop and sedan, with the lights and grille of the 1951/52 model. Of course in the US for example a model year is released late in the year before, which is why JFK was transported in a 1964 Cadillac Hearse in November 1963.

Townie54's picture
Townie54
Offline
DTCA Member

Portholes on the Buick as 51/52 on, on the wing rather than the bonnet side.

dinkycollect's picture
dinkycollect
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

Hi Terry

Do you mean that because of this logo  the Dinky is a Champion and not a Commander ?

Townie54's picture
Townie54
Offline
DTCA Member

It seems Champs and Commanders could be pillarless or pillared. Presumably you could also upspec your Champ with a V8 but whether you would want to have a 6 cylinder Commander who knows, but it seems that engine and spec options were always quite wide in the US provided you wanted 6 or 8 cylinders! When the ‘55 came in, two tone was introduced on the body, not just a contrasting roof, presumably why Dinky painted the flanks on the 24y/540 second Type. It’s like Johnny Cash’s Cadillac..........

Townie54's picture
Townie54
Offline
DTCA Member

Is it just the French Americans with these vagaries, or any other notable Dinkys? I’ve always thought the 131 Cadillac Eldorado looked very long and thin (artistic licence maybe?) and the 132 Packard too low and wide.

janwerner's picture
janwerner
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

Regarding your last remark I have dug up a photographic scale correction which I made a long time ago! Kind regards, Jan 

Townie54's picture
Townie54
Offline
DTCA Member

The Packard at 1:48 is correct in the 122” short wheelbase. Width, track, ground clearance about right. But 4mm too short overall, and 4mm too low. The Caddy is right in length and wheelbase but 5mm too narrow (it was actually wider as you show than the Packard) and similarly 4mm too low (so the drivers lose theirs wigs!) The Packard looked low and sleek in drawings (like the side view of the Dinky model) but was rather stately and upright and a poor seller.