Club News

 

User login

New Comments

-914 AEC Articulated Lorry (1965-70)

5 days 16 hours ago

-163 Bristol 450 Sports Coupé (1956-60)

1 week 1 day ago

-163 Bristol 450 Sports Coupé (1956-60)

1 week 1 day ago

-914 AEC Articulated Lorry (1965-70)

3 weeks 2 days ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

4 weeks 19 hours ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

4 weeks 20 hours ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

4 weeks 23 hours ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

4 weeks 23 hours ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

4 weeks 1 day ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

1 month 1 hour ago

-508 DAF

1 month 1 hour ago

--14c and 401Coventry Climax Fork Lift Truck (1949-64)

1 month 1 hour ago

FRENCH DINKY TALBOT LAGO

1 month 1 hour ago

-Boxes General Discussions including end flaps, both British and French

1 month 2 hours ago

--14c and 401Coventry Climax Fork Lift Truck (1949-64)

1 month 2 weeks ago

--14c and 401Coventry Climax Fork Lift Truck (1949-64)

1 month 2 weeks ago

-508 DAF

2 months 1 week ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 1 week ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 1 week ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 1 week ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 1 week ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 2 weeks ago

-508 DAF

2 months 2 weeks ago

-508 DAF

2 months 2 weeks ago

-508 DAF

2 months 2 weeks ago

New arrivals

2 months 2 weeks ago

New arrivals

2 months 2 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 2 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 2 weeks ago

ORIGINAL MECCANO DINKY TOYS FACTORY BOX ART 175 HILLMAN MINX SALOON + DRAWING

2 months 2 weeks ago

--29c and 290 Double Decker Bus (1938-63)

2 months 2 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 2 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 2 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 2 weeks ago

DTCAwebsite upgrade 2023

2 months 2 weeks ago

Visitors

  • Total Visitors: 1662963
  • Registered Users: 390
  • Published Nodes: 1681
  • Since: 04/16/2024 - 14:43
12 posts / 0 new
Last post

janwerner's picture
janwerner
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

--32c and 576 Tracteur Panhard avec semi-remorque citerne 'Esso' [Panhard Articulated Tanker 'Esso'] (1954-62)

Some attention now for the French articulated Esso tanker, no. 32c/576 Tracteur Panhard avec semi-remorque citerne, one of my all-time favourites, which made me insert a small ‘collecting excursion’ from British to French Dinky Toys thirteen years ago. Last September this model became 60! Both as a youngster and as an adult this French Dinky has always impressed me by the intricate details and the sheer fascinating, smooth design, both as a real vehicle and as a Dinky Toy. The low, flowing lines are irrisistable for me. I remember making acquaintance with it for the very first time in summer 1955, one of my earlier holidays memories.

It was shown to me by another boy who had also just got the impressive British (Foden) 10-ton Army Truck, a heavy giant in small children’s hands (issued in May 1954), another highly desired Dinky Toy. I never had the tanker in my Dinky Toys play range, so, 46 years later I decided to compensate for that and buy my first non-British Dinky road vehicle model for the collection.

Some facts, most of you will no doubt be familiar with. The Tracteur Panhard avec semi-remorque citerne was introduced in September 1954, as the last comer of the well-known trio of Panhard artics, the no. 32ab Tracteur Panhard avec semi-remorque S.N.C.F. and the no. 32aj Tracteur Panhard avec semi-remorque Kodak (both 1952). An odd numbering practice, by the way. In late summer 1954 it was a very fresh issue indeed, and considerably different from the two preceding Panhard artics.

The French factory introduced many counterpart Dinkies, closely resembling their British firsts:

The early Panhard couple was inspired on the British Bedford Articulated Lorry of 1948, but now with a tilt. The same goes for the no. 70 Remorque bachée, the French trailer, which can be seen as a covered counterpart of the British no. 551 Large Trailer of 1948.

The same can be observed for the smaller French tanker, no. 25u Ford camion citerne Esso à cabine avancée and its British colleague, the no. 30p Studebaker Petrol Tanker. This leads to the probability that the design of the present French articulated tanker was meant to be a parallel to the British Bedford Streamlined Articulated Petrol Tanker, the mysteriously discontinued project initiated in May 1948:

The no. 32c Esso artic is the successor of the single no. 25u Ford Camion citerne Esso, which was discontinued in 1953 after a production run of some three years only. See on this forum: http://www.dtcawebsite.org/dinky-forum/2-dtca- forum/2335-25-u-camion-citerne-ford-qessoq

The inside roof of the Panhard truck was smooth initially, but, like for most Dinkies, it got a ‘toit quadrillé’ in the course of time, a criss-cross pattern at the inside cabin roof for a better flow of the zamak in that tricky casting area. It also follows the range-wide development that the original convex hubs are changed for concave ones in the course of time. In the same way slightly treaded tyres followed the initial smooth medium size tyres. As a child no doubt many were annoyed by the fact that truck and trailer could not be uncoupled.

The Esso logo on the tank shows various subtle differences, as this photo of Richard demonstrates, and described in several publications. Renumbered 576 in 1959, a huge number of this popular model must have been sold between 1954 and 1962, because it is not very scarce nowadays.

The model of the truck is based on the Panhard Movic IE 45 of 1951, and the rear represents a Titan-Coder tanker trailer. The low design and the Esso Aviation Services logo unveil that it is no regular street vehicle but one providing the planes with fuel on airport platforms. The scale referred to is 1/55. These Movics had a 4HL engine producing 120 hp. The turning circle was very small, which was very practical for this airport tanker, and for the S.N.C.F. version on station platforms as well. I found no picture of the complete authentic real-world combination, the separate truck and tanker trailer only.

In fact, it is the Atlas edition of this model that made me compile this contribution. I have never been a fan of the Atlas replica editions of Dinky Toys. But I could not let this one go for the Dutch introduction price of 5 euros (!). I thought this was an excellent opportunity to have one specimen available for some comparative observations. And here are some results:

As a general impression the original tanker has a deeper red compared with the Atlas, which is bright red. The logo is the wider ‘open’ version. For the rest the general impression is exactly the same, the nickeled tinplate ladder included.

Looking at the models on their nice long yellow, black and red lettered Dinky Toys end flaps picture boxes there are no obvious differences either.

However, when matching them, the replica box is of a larger size than the original one. Although the lettertype used is the same, the typesetting is different, apparently newly designed.

The same goes for end flaps, but the Atlas could not state ‘C’est une fabrication Meccano’, of course.

This is the reason why the Atlas box has been produced in a slightly larger format: the transparent plastic packing piece base, which is oversized compared with the model, and the wrap around piece of artificial fabric had to be given some extra space, whereas the original Dinky fits snugly in its box.

Some other views, Atlas on the left, Dinky on the right, compare for yourself:


Atlas


Atlas


Dinky


Atlas


Dinky

These last two pictures illustrate that there is a significant difference in weight, a result probably due to the thinner width of the casting here and there.

By the way, CIJ Norev produced another replica version of the Panhard tanker in the attractive green ‘Energic BP Energol’ livery, with the catalogue number C80450.

When looking at the finish of the casting it is obvious that the Atlas has a smoothness of the casting surface that cannot by far be matched by the Dinky Toy, which has the familiar minuscule casting irregularities in the surface. This is a really obvious difference, which Meccano would have been jealous of in the 1950s! And this extremely smooth surface is a difference that makes any Atlas model identifiable without having a look underneath. This is both admirably sophisticated, but also ‘sterile’, if observed through the eyes of many Dinky Toys collectors – me included. This ‘introduction price’ of 5 euros is ridiculous of course, but even the regular prices tend to be about 20% of an original m/b Dinky Toy. Putting all prejudices aside, if you abstract it from the original Dinky Toy, and if you just like a perfect model, both as condition and quality of the casting is concerned, it is an unsurpassed alternative, which is much easier to find than an original Dinky in the same spotless condition. Putting my own prejudices aside: even the Atlas arouses with me the same sensation of this beautiful design as it did sixty years ago! Still, I would never collect them, because it also gives me the uneasy feeling that an Atlas pretends to be something that it isn’t, and will never be!

Kind regards, Jan

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Jan-
A wonderful article and so timely, what we so many items now available in the Atlas line. This is the first definitive, in-depth comparison that I have seen, and it is remarkable in that at least in this case, they do appear to make a very good representation of an original Dinky Toy model. The differences are slight, but noticeable immediately to a serious Dinky collector. Not only is the painted surface almost perfect and smooth, but the silver accenting is also somewhat "better". I say better, because as Jan so nicely pointed out, part of the charm of the original Dinky Toys is the seeming imperfections apparent in almost all versions, and after a lifetime of collecting them, that is the norm. I have the same reaction when I see some of the very nicely done Code 3 models, whereby the restorer has not only refinished them, but has also "improved" on them. Besides the paint, the big giveaway to me is the silver areas, such as he headlights or grills. Dinky had a ways of finishing these that resulted in a "softer" look to me. Code 3's not only over finish these areas, but they also paint in door handles and other details that Dinky did not.
So Atlas has recreated these quite nicely, and for a very reasonable price. Like Jan, I have no interest in collecting these, other than having a representative sample, and I also wonder if their availability will stimulate interest in Dinky collecting, or drive those away because they are so much cheaper.
But hats off to Jan for providing us with such a comprehensive article, and also for giving some well deserved attention to the French Panhard trio. I also have always liked these trucks and thought they did a very nice job with them, and the Esso is particularly handsome. Below is a photo of my three.
Regards,
Terry

 

buzzer999's picture
buzzer999
Offline
DTCA MemberUK

Lovely article Jan, I share your views on Atlas.

Terry your three artics are fabulous. As someone who has spent almost all of his life as a photographer I really want the Kodak version, it always seems so expensive but I will have one someday.

Dave

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Dave--
Thanks for the compliment....like Jan, I have always liked the Panhard articulated trucks, as they are just pretty neat models. Trying to find a very nice Kodak truck will not be easy, nor inexpensive, but they are out there. Most of the ones I see are quite chipped up, and the yellow tends to show every little detail. Since you have an appreciation for Kodak, I have included the photo below of the Panhard Kodak, alongside its smaller cousin, the Bedford Kodak van.
Regards,
Terry

 

janwerner's picture
janwerner
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

I like the three indeed, but I have only one. :(
Nevertheless, fortunately the Panhard citerne is by far my favourite one.
Regards, Jan

Richard's picture
Richard
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

I Jan.
Very interesting investigation on one of the best french Dinky and very well done !
Allow me to complete your article with two photos :

The rear different stickers :

The last panhard made with concave hubs :

The box is numbered 576

Kind regards

Richard

Richard's picture
Richard
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

You also can see that the white line is not really white ! it's pink, probably because the paint coat is too thin and doesn't cover enough the red.

Richard

janwerner's picture
janwerner
Offline
DTCA MemberNetherlands

Two nice pictures, a look-alike of the 1:1 tanker - not exactly the same - and a photo of my tanker and its newly acquired brother, no. 32ab Tracteur Panhard avec semi-remorque S.N.C.F.!

Jan

dinkycollect's picture
dinkycollect
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

Jan,

Very nice picture of an Esso refueler but the name of your file states Berliet. In fact the prime mover is a Somua. Look how similar it is to the 29d postwar Somua Paris bus.

Somua merged with Latil and Renault trucks to become Saviem LRS. LRS stands for Latil, Renault and Somua.

Saviem LRS became just Saviem and later Renault Trucks which is now owned by Volvo

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Jan--
Although not exactly the same, it is still a great photo of that tanker rig, and is the best I have seen....thanks for sharing it! I seem to remember seeing copies of actual photos of the Panhard truck with the SNCF trailer in some older French Dinky literature or catalog.....does anyone have a handy copy of that to share? Thanks again!
Best regards,
Terry

dinkycollect's picture
dinkycollect
Offline
DTCA MemberFrance

Terry,

This is certainly the photo that you are refering to. Sorry I can not remember which.

These Panhard trucks which were smaller than the Somua were used by the S.N.C.F. after the mechanical horses (the French made tracteurs FAR) had been decommissioned.

There are models of the Somua refueller, I found this picture on Google with "Somua truck".

Jacques.

dinkyfan's picture
dinkyfan
Offline
DTCA MemberUSA

Jacques--
Thanks...that was the one I had remembered!
Regards,
Terry